The Rizal Law and Its Significance Today free essay sample

My initial ideas about the Rizal law was that it was another uninteresting legislative document that needs to be understood and memorized. Being a teenager, thats my way of thinking. I figured that since it is a law, it will tackle all about technicalities and provisions. I also thought that the Rizal Law was made for the sole purpose of perpetuating the name and works of our national hero. I was partly wrong. As I read the Rizal Law, I was correct about it tackling about provisions and technicalities. At the same time, I proved myself wrong with my assumptions of the Rizal Law being uninteresting. More so, I was able to have a better grasp and understanding of what it is to be nationalistic. What is it in the Rizal Law that caught my attention? To start with, my thoughts about it being insignificant to me was changed. It had everything to do with me. We will write a custom essay sample on The Rizal Law and Its Significance Today or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page It was created precisely for students. How so? In the law, it tackles all about Rizals works and/or life to be implemented in all schools. Who are the people in schools and who will benefit from the Rizal Law? The students. The law was really interesting to learn, as it turns out. Suddenly my opinions were turned upside down. It changed because the objectives of the document were like speaking to me. The objectives being to reawaken the Filipinos nationalism, to open the eyes of the filipino from colonial mentality and to make the students proud of the history. Those made re-examine myself and reflect upon my own sense of nationalism. In the module, I was able to know what the Rizal law was for. The law was to ignite the sense of nationalism of the countrys people. Its not just some typical law stating that everyone should have a background about the national hero and his works. Yes, its main point was to let every Filipino learn from the past as depicted in Dr. Jose Rizals novels. And yes, it encourages us to at least know something about Dr. Jose Rizals life. But its more than just that. The law itself is a beacon of hope and faith. The law itself signifies the hardwork of our fellow countrymen, mainly Jose P. Laurel and Claro M. Recto with some other minor personalities, in defending that in studying these novels and the life of our national hero will spark once again our nationalism that was once shining ever so brightly. Of course, every Republic Act has its origin. I learned that the Republic Act 1425 is actually an amended version of a bill. This bill was called the Noli-Fili Bill. Although the bill was the origin, the two are quite different. There are some similarities but a lot of differences can be seen. Firstly, the bill and the law aims to promote nationalism within the country. Its aim is to spread the ideologies of Rizal. The significance of Rizals works to the lives of the filipino people is vastly great because it mirrors the situation of the past to the present. It gives us answers to questions that are difficult to answer. The readings, specifically the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, should be in their unexpurgated versions. Meaning, the texts should be in their unedited or original state. This was changed though due to religious beliefs of the filipinos. This was done because the unexpurgated version of the texts might hinder the development of the faith of the people, according to the catholic church. Since there are similarities, there are also differences between the bill and the law. The noticeable difference is the specific punishments stated in the Noli Fili Bill which werent written in the Rizal Law. Basically, the more strict between the two is the Noli Fili Bill. We can look at the Rizal Law as the milder version. Next to that is that is the amount of money alotted for the usage of the implementation of the law. Transparency about finance was shown in the Rizal Law. To follow is that of the requirements of all libraries to have sufficient number of books that could cater to the students if ever they wish to read the book of Rizal. This is necessary so that those who dont have the books or just want to read the books can have access to the texts. It can also serve as an aid to the studies of the students. The Noli Fili Bill and the Rizal Bill was created for the filipino people. It was done for the best interests of everyone and no other reason. The aim of the bill and the law are the same but its means of executing the provisions are different. So it gives me an idea that even if these two are connected to each other, theyre still two separate things. Well, I learned that you really cant please everyone. In something that you o, no matter how good the argument is, no matter how logical and needed it is, someone will always be there to give a rebuttal. Like in the battle for the enforcement of the bill into a law, it took such a long time to be processed and approved. The debate between Claro M. Recto and Senator Rodrigo was proof that not everyone had the same views on the bill. Claro was able to rebutt all of the arguments of Sen. Rodrigo. An example is when Senator Rodrigo said, It was not necessary to have read the novels of Rizal in order to venerate him, that Rizal would still be a hero even if he had not written his books. It was because of the sufferings that he endured that he became our national hero. † and he answered, For what would Sen. Rodrigo honor Rizal if he had not written the Noli and El Fili? If Rizal had not written the two books, the Spaniards would not have made him suffer; they would not have shot him. He would not be the national hero of the Philippines. There are a number of people who were pros and antis with the law. Emilio Aguinaldo, Mayor Arsenio Lacson and Sen. Quintin Paredes were in favor of the law while the clergies of the catholic church together with Sen. Rodrigo, Ramon Durano and Luciano Paredes were against it. Somehow, in some way, the people had their own say about the passing of this law. Differences in the understanding of the law made it difficult for President Magsaysay to sign the bill into a law. But because of the revision of the bill, it was turned into a republic act. Most important of all, the bill and the law was written for nationalistic purposes. Not in a way that the people will be like Andres Bonifacio and Dr. Jose Rizal who died for their own country but a sense of nationalism that shows how proud they are of their country. The law is not just for learning. It seeks to bring back what once was the mightiest trait that the Filipinos had. It gives the Filipinos the drive to do something for themselves and be proud of it. That we have the capabilities to actually change the world. Were not indolent. Were not so stupid as some people might claim. In reading the works of Dr. Jose Rizal, like To The Filipino youth, we will know that Filipinos are also intelligent. That our country has a lot to offer to the world. I cant actually say that I alone was able to answer all of the questions resented to us. There were some aspects that were difficult for me to understand so I needed help from other people. In terms of absorbing the law itself and knowing what it contains, I can say that I understood most of the ideas there. Its just difficult to explain how it works, like theres no possible word to explain what it really does. Frankly, I didnt expect that such a law wouldve caused such a ruckus in the 1950s. A rucku s in a way that heated debates happened and the destruction of reputation was done. Who wouldve thought that a bill wanting to teach students about the novels of Dr. Jose Rizal could deal such damage? That was nothing I expected because I thought that the people had a good grasp between the governments job and what is the churchs job. The governments job was to enforce law beneficial to the people while the churchs job was to enlighted the people with their spirituality and to teach morals to the people. I do understand that they both had the peoples best interest at heart, but what I dont get is that it lead to an ugly picture. My new questions about the topic are, why does the church belittle the faith of the Filipino people? Why do they feel threatened by Rizals books? And why is it that they act like theyre the government officials in a way that their say in a matter is highly accounted for? Out of those three questions, the answer to the second one really intrigues me. If I was to get the answer to that question, I bet that a lot of people would benefit from it because itll give them a better understanding of why the unexpurgated versions of Rizals books were so controversial. So far, I havent gotten an answer to my new questions yet due to lack of time. Hopefully in the future, Ill get an answer. The Rizal Law is more than just a law. It preserves and teaches the youth to be proud of their motherland. The law shows the mighty deeds of the colonized filipinos. It is not to be taken lightly or to be made fun of because through this law the future generations will have the same sense of nationalism that we do. The bill and the law is different from one another. One should not mistake the law as the bill. They have the same aim and some similar provisions but as a whole, the two are really different. The bill was more strict and urged the compulsery reading of the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. The law tackles everything that has something to do with Rizal. There are always pros and cons. Somethin cant please everybody. Thats why people taking sides cant be avoided. Its a matter of what will prevail. In terms of the Rizal law, the pros won. They found a way to stop the catholic church from hindering them and their solution is to make an amended version of the bill. The provisions in the amended bill no longer hindered the opinion of the church and so the passing of that bill come on smoothly. Lastly, the law aims for a nationalistic Filipino citizen. Being a Filipino, one should love your country with all your heart. Be proud of it and dont let anyone step on your neck and say that youre lower. One is not above the other. We should not revere to other countries as better. Were the same. We have the same capabilities that the others have. What should matter is our own productivity and that we should be proud of it.

Biography of Lorenzo de Medici

Biography of Lorenzo de' Medici Lorenzo de’ Medici, (January 1, 1449 – April 8, 1492) was a Florentine politician and one of the most prominent patrons of arts and culture in Italy. During his reign as de facto leader of the Florentine Republic, he held together political alliances while sponsoring artists and encouraging the peak of the Italian Renaissance. Fast Facts: Lorenzo de' Medici Known For: Statesman and de facto leader of Florence whose reign coincided with a boom in the Italian Renaissance, thanks largely to his patronage of arts, culture, and philosophy.Also Known As: Lorenzo the Magnificent Born: January 1, 1449 in Florence, Republic of Florence (modern-day Italy)Died: April 8, 1492 at Villa Medici at Careggi, Republic of FlorenceSpouse: Clarice Orsini (m. 1469)Children: Lucrezia Maria Romola (b. 1470), Piero (b. 1472), Maria Maddalena Romola (b. 1473), Giovanni (b. 1475), Luisa (b. 1477), Contessina Antonia Romola (b. 1478), Giuliano (b. 1479); also adopted nephew Giulio di Giuliano de Medici (b. 1478)Quote:  Ã¢â‚¬Å"What I have dreamed in an hour is worth more than what you have done in four.†Ã‚   Medici Heir Lorenzo was a son of the Medici family, who held political power in Florence but also held power by virtue of the Medici Bank, which was the most powerful and respected bank in all of Europe for many years. His grandfather, Cosimo de’ Medici, cemented the family’s role in Florentine politics, while also spending a great deal of his vast fortune on building up the city-state’s public projects and its arts and culture. Lorenzo was one of five children born to Piero di Cosimo de’ Medici and his wife, Lucrezia (nee Tournabuoni). Piero was at the center of Florence’s politics scene and was an art collector, while Lucrezia was a poet in her own right and befriended many philosophers and fellow poets of the era. Because Lorenzo was deemed the most promising of their five children, he was brought up from a young age with the expectation that he would be the next Medici ruler. He was tutored by some of the top thinkers of the day and accomplished some notable achievements- such as winning a jousting tournament- while still a youth. His closest associate was his brother, Giuliano, who was the handsome, charming â€Å"golden boy† to Lorenzo’s plainer, more serious self. The Young Ruler In 1469, when Lorenzo was twenty years old, his father died, leaving Lorenzo to inherit the work of ruling Florence. Technically, the Medici patriarchs did not rule the city-state directly, but instead were statesmen who â€Å"ruled† via threats, financial incentives, and marriage alliances. Lorenzo’s own marriage took place the same year he took over from his father; he married Clarice Orsini, the daughter of a nobleman from another Italian state. The couple went on to have ten children and one adopted son, seven of whom survived to adulthood, including two future popes (Giovanni, the future Leo X, and Giulio, who became Clement VII). From the very beginning, Lorenzo de’ Medici was a major patron of the arts, even more so than others in the Medici dynasty, which always place a high value on the arts. Although Lorenzo himself rarely commissioned work, he often connected artists with other patrons and helped them get commissions. Lorenzo himself was also a poet. Some of his poetry- often concerned with the human condition as a combination of the bright and lovely alongside the melancholy and temporary- survives to this day. Artists who enjoyed Lorenzo’s patronage included some of the most influential names of the Renaissance: Leonardo da Vinci, Sandro Botticelli, and Michelangelo Buonarroti. In fact, Lorenzo and his family even opened their home to Michelangelo for three years while he lived and worked in Florence. Lorenzo also encouraged the development of humanism through the philosophers and scholars in his inner circle, who worked to reconcile the thought of Plato with Christian thought. The Pazzi Conspiracy Because of the Medici monopoly over Florentine life, other powerful families vacillated between alliance and enmity with the Medici. On April 26, 1478, one of those families came close to toppling the Medici reign. The Pazzi conspiracy involved other families, such as the Salviati clan, and was backed by Pope Sixtus IV in an attempt to overthrow the Medici. On that day, Lorenzo was attacked, along with his brother and co-ruler Giuliano, in the Cathedral of Santa Maria del Fiore. Lorenzo was wounded but escaped with minor wounds, in part thanks to the assistance and defense of his friend, the poet Poliziano. Giuliano, however, was not as lucky: he suffered a violent death by stabbing. The response to the attack was swift and harsh, both on the part of the Medici and Florentines themselves. The conspirators were executed, and members of their families were also severely punished. Giuliano left behind an illegitimate son, Giulio, who was adopted and raised by Lorenzo and Clarice. Since the conspirators acted with the blessing of the pope, he attempted to seize Medici assets and excommunicated all of Florence. When that failed to bring Lorenzo around, he tried allying with Naples and launched an invasion. Lorenzo and the citizens of Florence defended their city, but the war took its toll, as some of Florence’s allies failed to come to their aid. Eventually, Lorenzo personally traveled to Naples to forge a diplomatic solution. He also commissioned some of Florence’s best artists to travel to the Vatican and paint new murals in the Sistine Chapel, as a gesture of reconciliation with the pope. Later Rule and Legacy Although his support for culture would ensure his legacy was a positive one, Lorenzo de’ Medici made some unpopular political decisions too. When alum, a hard-to-find but important compound for making glass, textiles, and leather, was discovered in nearby Volterra, the citizens of that city asked Florence for help mining it. However, a dispute soon arose when the citizens of Volterra realized the real value of the resource and wanted it for their own city, rather than the Florentine bankers assisting them. A violent insurrection resulted, and the mercenaries Lorenzo sent to end it sacked the city, permanently marring Lorenzo’s reputation. For the most part, though, Lorenzo attempted to rule peacefully; the cornerstone of his policy was to maintain a balance of power among the Italian city-states and to keep outside European powers out of the peninsula. He even maintained good trading ties with the Ottoman Empire. Despite his efforts, the Medici coffers were drained by their spending and by bad loans their bank supported, so Lorenzo began trying to fill the gaps through misappropriations. He also brought the charismatic friar Savonarola to Florence, who preached about the destructive nature of secular art and philosophy, among other things. The sensationalist friar would, in a few years’ time, help salvage Florence from French invasion, but would also lead to the end of Medici rule. Lorenzo de’ Medici died at the Villa Medici at Careggi, on April 8, 1492, reportedly dying peacefully after hearing the day’s Scripture readings. He was buried in the Church of San Lorenzo, alongside his brother Giuliano. Lorenzo left behind a Florence that would soon overthrow Medici rule- although his son and his nephew would eventually return the Medici to power- but he also left behind a rich and vast legacy of culture that came to define Florence’s place in history. Sources Kent, F.W. Lorenzo de’ Medici and the Art of Magnificence. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2004.â€Å"Lorenzo de’ Medici: Italian Statesman.† Encyclopaedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Lorenzo-de-Medici.Parks, Tim. Medici Money: Banking, Metaphysics, and Art in Fifteenth-Century Florence. New York: W.W. Norton Co., 2008.Unger, Miles J. Magnifico: The Brilliant Life and Violent Times of Lorenzo de’ Medici. Simon Schuster, 2009.

WK 4 PERCEPTION KEY Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

WK 4 PERCEPTION KEY - Assignment Example Towards the end, the composition returns to F note, building a feeling of completeness in listeners-releases tension. There are no areas in the composition where F is expected to be the next not and it is not. It has been supplied well when expected signifying a sense of stability or temporary stability, indicating that, the supply of F appropriately helps release tension in listeners. The difference in the temporary finality created in the middle section and the finality expressed at the end is effective in the sense that, it shows as the effects of temporary stability, the limits of our movement from that stability and the associated security and pleasures of total stability experienced at the end. This composition evokes a feeling of insecurity and tensions associated with being away from home. Just as this composition, swing low sweet chariot, any piece that produces what is expected of it, is not only interesting but also satisfying. Rock dance is a dance technique that is highly demanding because of its acrobatics, high speeds, and is also a straining dance performance considered to be a preserve of young dancers. Rock dancing demands loud music because it is argued that, loud music is in sync with intense energy. In order to achieve the requirements of rock dancing techniques, loud music is essential, because, it is an obvious synchronization of body and mind. Performing of powerful and spontaneous muscular motions explains the popularity of rock dance, especially in the sixties and the seventies. This is attributed to the fact that it is very competitive, athletic and is a dance that, although demanding, can be performed by both groups and couples. Older generations dislike both rock dance and rock music because of their acrobatic, high-energy, speeds and loud music respectively. For this reason, rock dancing is a mode that can be both danced and watched. Rock